“Beats and Beatitudes”

1. “Challenging “Sacred” Values”

Luke 6:20-26

First Presbyterian Church

Donald E. Ray

June 22, 2008

Return to the Sermons and Articles Page

Return to the Sermon Archives Page

I was a teen when “Beat” was making the scene as a literary movement with the post World War II generation whose attitudes and life style were far removed from typical Americana .  My father was an embodiment of the Protestant work ethic—the hard work ethic.  We were a farm family because my father saw that as affording the security of always having food on the table.  We grew crops to feed the cattle and vegetables in the garden.  My mother was responsible for a few flowers and decorative bushes in the front yard.  But the back yard was fruit trees and grape vines.  

The Beat and the beatnik, hippie culture that followed and its images of Bohemian, long haired, disheveled flower children with no roots in the earth were anathema in my father’s view.  Though growing up during the flowering of the beat generation, I missed it.  My cars were plain sedans and family station wagons.  I had no longing, at least not acknowledged, for a VW bus (show picture) to roam the country.  I say “not acknowledged” because, as I think about it, my love for the natural setting of camping and a three week mid-life family vacation in 1984 to roam the country may be more akin to “Beat” than my ingrained Protestant hard work ethic would like to admit.  

Having said that about my history, this summer’s theme—“Beats and Beatitudes” will be a stretch for me.  If I’ve learned anything across the years it is that to stretch is good.  

Jack Kerouac at the roots of the Beat literary movement used the term “beat” to describe both the negative of his world that he saw as beating him down and the positives of his response to it.  “Beat” implies weariness and disinterest in social and political activity but also was suggested as reminiscent of the Beatitudes of Jesus—the declaration of blessedness and happiness.  

In our initial discussions, Tom and I agreed these first two weeks would be a kind of introduction to the theme.  Still playing catch-up with the “beat” after the influence of my father’s disdain for that culture, I laid claim to the beatitude piece.  If you are more intrigued by the “beat,” you’ll need to wait for Tom’s part next Sunday.  

Tom sent me an e-mail Friday about another matter, closing it writing; “Looking forward to the preaching series.”  In my reply, I considered the same closing but realized I couldn’t honestly write it then at noontime.  Living with the work in progress while doing some “no-brainer” chores in the early afternoon, four hours later I could say that I was—am looking forward to living with the Beatitudes and discovering the beat movement from a different point of view.  

Looking at the Beatitudes through the filter of the “Beat” movement, I find the similarities uncanny.  From what the Gospels describe of the life of Jesus, he was bohemian before his time.  Jesus roamed the country devoid of baggage.  Unlike the ascetic, Wilderness John the Baptist, Jesus admittedly enjoyed a good taste of life: wine and dinner at the local tax collector’s house.  Along with John, who called the crowds with their traditional ways a brood of vipers, Jesus was altogether critical of the established values.  Luke’s version of the Beatitudes especially makes it evident that there are not only blessing for those not afforded opportunity to revel in what has been considered the good life.  Luke adds a list of woes by which the whole value culture is open to challenge.  

When I was a child in Church School , part of our curriculum was to memorize the Beatitudes—I learned Matthew’s version.  It’s not likely I could recite them now, but then it was an okay experience, in fact rather reassuring.  I could identify with several on the list.  We were poor; had occasion for sadness; meekness follows being on the fringes as farm folk tend to be in an urban culture.  It was comforting to feel that one day our life would be redeemed.  While we were on the low end of the socio-economic scale, I interpreted the Beatitudes as saying that one day God would bless us with riches, happiness, privileges so long as we believed humbly and faithfully.  

It was easy for me to dismiss altogether the beat culture.  It’s language excesses and promiscuous sexuality, its drop out from productive society, its drug induced pursuit of a blissful reality, were all contrary to the values I had absorbed.  To me, reality was in doing a better job at upholding those values.  

I am beginning to realize how easy it has been for me to dismiss the beatitudes as well.  To look at them as assurance that God sides with the outcast, the short changed, those beat down by our culture and that favor means we will one day enjoy a fair share of the benefits of creation is a misreading.  Luke’s version makes that clear.  

Luke could be seen as a precursor of the beat literary movement.  Disillusioned with the reigning social constraints, he finds blessing in a whole other way of life.  The blessing of the poor is not that one day you will be rich or at least less poor.  Blessing for the hungry is not that one day you will banquet lavishly.  The blessing for those who weep isn’t that one day you will have the last laugh.  If you are shut out and persecuted, blessing is not finally getting recognition considered deserved.  Luke makes it clear that the flip side for the disenfranchised is not finally getting a fair share.  Woe, he writes, to you who are rich—now or in your dreams.  Woe to you who feast; who laugh heartily—too heartily; to you who claim the awards.  You already have all that there is and there is no more to fill all the life that is yet to live.  

Perhaps there was the beat movement in the mid 20th century and how many others across the centuries between because the beat movement of the first century was too easily dismissed.  We are still a culture locked into the pursuit of riches in spite of the disillusionment associated with wealth and the hardship for those left behind.  We are still a culture that laughs, often to keep from crying.  We are still a culture that in spite of the horror and futility of it pursues war instead of making peace.  We are still a people enslaved to image rather than living by integrity and value at the core of our being.  

Blessing say the beatitudes is in the kingdom of God .  Beyond, above, instead of our pursuits in life is that Way, Truth, Spirit, Love that to live in and enjoy is the fulfilling life.  Hunger is never to be satisfied for hunger is to yearn, to seek, to stretch, to grow, and therein to always be discovering that which fills.  Weeping is the valuing of life, and love and connection that brings tears at every wounding but always finds the fullness of joy in its being and relationships.  Criticism pales beside the sense of integrity, compassion, generosity, love that is the fruit of a life lived in all that one can know and trust of God.  

I am learning that there was a spirituality about the beat literary movement of the mid 20th century that underlies what I was conditioned to find repulsive.  My hope is that this summer can be such a quest with the beat movement and the beatitudes providing a model.  I would hope that this might be an interactive journey across the realm of spiritual discovery.  I am not suggesting we resurrect a VW bus to travel across… well to travel.  Personally, I categorically reject the use of drugs in the pursuit of happiness or some kind of reality.  I’m not sure I’d be into standing on street corners handing out flowers.  Though, thinking about it, that could be far better than what is too often passed out on street corners.  Perhaps gathering on Prendergast Avenue to share hot dogs with community folk could be part of the journey.  Though, thinking about it again, flowers too might be a nice added touch to stir the beauty at the soul of life.  I am suggesting that we take seriously the beatitudes’ challenge to those values our culture has claimed sacred with out the authority to declare them as such.  I am suggesting that we stretch and venture a bit perhaps to find God—love that is blessing in the soul of life.  

I missed the beat movement the first time around.  I realize that I didn’t miss its disillusionment with the socio-economic constraints of our culture.  Memorizing the Beatitudes almost a life time ago provided an acquaintance with the literature of another beat movement.  I once thought that made me a part of that movement, but I’m realizing I, and I hope we, can see there is still a long way to go.  

Eugene Peterson writes that “We are only capable of renouncing a false life when we are familiar with a real life.  Those years of association with Jesus for the disciples, years of ‘growing up,’ were years of realizing in sharp and precise detail that life is what God gives us in Jesus: grace, healing, forgiveness,…” (1)  

We hope this summer provides association with the beat literary movement of the mid 20th century and the beat movement that preceded it by two millenniums.  There, in the challenges to values long held, but values that really hold us, we may join in the spiritual quest for beatitude—for blessing.  

Amen.  

(1) “Living the Message”, Eugene Peterson  p. 176

© Copyright 2008 First Presbyterian Church

Return to the Sermons and Articles Page

Return to the Sermon Archives Page