“Beats and Beatitudes”
3.
The ‘Peter Martin’ in Us
Matthew 5:1-16
First
Presbyterian
The Reverend Thomas A. Sweet
July 6, 2008
The
“Beats” of the 1950s got into trouble with some of the people of their day
because they refused to give their country, our country, a free moral pass.
They called their country, our country, to account for its deeds and were
not at all hesitant to point out actions they believed to be morally, ethically,
or socially vacuous. Because they
were not willing to conform to someone else’s definition of what it meant to
be a good American, and because they were not willing to acquiesce to the
idolatrous melding of God and Country, they got labeled by some, including FBI
Director J. Edgar Hoover and others, as anti-Americans.
The prophets of ancient
Sixty years ago, Jack Kerouac,
who generally is regarded as the “father” of the beat generation, said that “In
In the midst of such wild claims
and presumption, it seems to me imperative for us, as a nation-state and as
citizens in it, to cultivate and to grow our spiritual natures lest, as Jesus
said, “we gain the world but lose our soul.”
I do deeply believe that “loss of soul” is the greatest danger
presently facing
the poor in spirit who are blessed…
those who mourn who are blessed…
the meek who are blessed…
those who hunger and thirst for righteousness who are blessed…
the merciful who are blessed…
the pure in heart who are blessed…
the peacemakers who are blessed…
those who are persecuted for their loyalty to God’s way of life who
are blessed…
Today we embark on a closer look
at the beat-i-tudes and begin, fittingly, with the first of the beat-i-tudes of
Jesus: “Blessed are the poor in
spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven…”
Early in his novel called The
Town and the City, author Jack Kerouac introduces us to the central
character of the book, a young man by the name of Peter Martin, who also
represents Kerouac’s own persona. The
town in the story Kerouac names Galloway and is modeled on Kerouac’s hometown
of
But Peter is restless wherever
he is. He needs both the town and
the city, but cannot remain long in either one.
Near the end of the novel, George Martin, Peter’s father, dies and is
buried in the family plot in a small town in
Peter was alone in the rainy night. He
was on the road again,
traveling the continent westward, going off to further and further
years, alone by the waters of life…looking down along the shore
in remembrance of the dearness of his father and all of life…
When the railroad trains moaned, and river-winds blew, bringing
echoes through the vale, it was as if a wild hum of voices, the
dear voices of everybody he had known, were crying:
“Peter, Peter,
where are you going, Peter?”
Through Peter Martin, Kerouac
tells of his ongoing spiritual struggle, his need for a sense of place, and yet
his competing need to hear and to respond to the call of the unknown.
Kerouac intends for Peter Martin to be any person of any age who finds
himself or herself twisting between the need both for roots that the town
represents and wings, represented by the city.
Stephen Edington, who writes about Peter Martin in his book entitled The
Beat Face of God says of himself, “Even in the sixth decade of my
life, I have not ceased being Peter Martin.
I still move between the town and the city: the security and
predictability of the town, the adventure and open-endedness of the city, and
the call of mystery and the unknown. These
are components of any journey of the spirit.” (1)
It is my contention that what
Jesus means by being poor in spirit is coming to know and to embrace the Peter
Martin in us, and that holds true whether we are talking about our own lives or
our nation’s. It means letting go
of an all-planned-out-in-advance life. It
means living serially while foregoing certainty.
By living serially, I mean that we have regularly to be asking ourselves,
“Tom, Tom, where are you going, Tom?”
(filling in your own name, of course.)
In an election year, Peter Martin reminds us that our country also is at
its best not when it engages the world dogmatically or doctrinally, but when it
routinely ponders the question, “
Being poor in spirit means being
available moment by moment to respond to the Spirit’s call in and on our lives
even when that call may ask us to defy custom and our own and other peoples’
expectations. Being poor in spirit
requires a willingness in us to venture into places and circumstances we never
imagined ourselves going, but going anyway if the Spirit so beckons us.
Being poor in spirit means considering the needs of others in addition to
our own, and the effect on others, of our desires and actions.
Being poor in spirit means trusting God whom we cannot see more than we
trust the apparent appearances of things right in front of our eyes and the
conventional wisdom in the forefront of our minds for, as Paul says, “…what
we can see is temporary and is passing away, while what we cannot immediately
see is eternal.” Being poor in
spirit means allowing the ways and means of God to usurp in us the pomposity of
pride and prejudice.
Jesus often asked himself, “Jesus,
Jesus, where are you going, Jesus? Are
you going simply to follow the lead of popular opinion or the path of least
resistance or the way of self-interest? Or
am I going to take “the road less traveled by,” the one on which I decide to
“love my perceived enemies” and to “do to others as I would have them do
to me” and to “extract the log from my own eye before pointing out the speck
in someone else’s”? Am I going
to demonize those who are different from me and my group, those who are called
outcasts, sinners, and evil-doers, or am I going to go to dinner with them and
talk to them and seek to understand more than to be understood?
Am I more afraid of losing face than losing my soul?”
The way Jesus answered those
questions is the reason we still gather in his name two millennia later.
The way he embodied his answers in his life and living are what we have
come to identify with the kingdom of heaven.
“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of
heaven.”
Lawrence Ferlinghetti was a
prolific “beat” writer, still writing, whose twin poems entitled “Dragon’s
Teeth” and “Speak Out!” that he wrote at the beginning of the
war with Iraq still stand, in my opinion, as the quintessential indictment of it
but are, perhaps, a little impertinent for a 4th of July weekend
sermon in church. His books of
poetry have sold over a million copies. He
has a poem called Christ Climbed Down that appears in his collection
called A Coney Island of the Mind.
It goes, in part, like this:
Christ climbed down
from His bare Tree
this year
and softly stole away into
some anonymous Mary’s womb again
where in the darkest night
of everybody’s anonymous soul
He waits again
an unimaginable
and impossibly
Immaculate Reconception
the very craziest
of second comings.
The
idea that the second coming of the Christ is the rebirth of the spirit of Christ
“in everybody’s anonymous soul” right now rather than some cosmic and
cataclysmic event denoting the end of the world is at the heart of the first
beat-i-tude. The Peter Martin in us
has us asking of our own lives, “Tom, Tom, where are you going, Tom?” and
of our nation’s, “
Blessed
are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Amen.
(1) Stephen D. Edington, The Beat Face of God, Trafford Publishing Company, 2006.
© Copyright 2008 First Presbyterian Church